Search This Blog (A.K.A. "I Dote On...")

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Keep Your Eyes on Blairmont

Even though the rumor is that Blairmont is planning a mixed-use community that will incorporate preservation, their track record remains terribly suspect.

Demolition permits seemed to have spiked in the Blairmont neighborhoods (St. Louis Place and Jeff Vanderlou, primarily). Here are a few recent permits issued by the Building Division. All that are listed have been completed, which means these buildings are no more. Images are provided by the St. Louis Community Information Network site ("Geo St. Louis").

2513 Slattery
Neighborhood: Jeff Vanderlou
Owner: Sheridan Place
Demolished: January 20, 2009

Notes: The city describes the demolition permit as "Rubble Only--Emergency". Was this a brick rustled property?



2617 Slattery

Neighborhood: Jeff Vanderlou
Owner: VHS Partners
Demolished: January 20, 2009
This one is on the same block as the previous; they were both destroyed on the same day, leaving a massive gap in the middle of a long block. Hmm...

Notes: Another rubble removal.


2303 Hebert
Neighborhood: St. Louis Place
Owner: Blairmont Associates
Demolished: February 4, 2009


2318 Hebert
Neighborhood: St. Louis Place
Owner: Blairmont Associates
Demolished: February 11, 2009
Notes: This was an emergency demolition permit.

2547-49 Dodier Neighborhood: St. Louis Place
Owner: Dodier Investors
Demolished: March 13, 2009
Notes: This one is really upsetting because it's a corner building. Once these go, the integrity of the already weak block is bound to suffer.

Other non-Blairmont demolitions in the area:

2517 Glasgow (Jeff Vanderlou)

3110 N. 23rd (St. Louis Place) - This one is another tragic demolition. It's a gorgeous Second Empire alley house (it fronts the alley between Sullivan and Hebert). Wait, I should say it fronted. The city says it's gone as of February 24, 2009. Unique properties like this need careful stewardship, not careless disregard.


2249 Sullivan (St. Louis Place)
Another lost attractive corner building.


4135 Page (Vandeventer neighborhood).
Okay, so this isn't Blairmontville, but it's still unfortunate. The left (west) twin the set was demolished earlier this year.



The number of demolitions in the City of St. Louis per year without any sort of redevelopment plans seems staggering. Though I've only included North City demolitions here, with a focus on Blairmont, there are many surprises over the past couple months. These include demolitions in rows of housing that have never seen any alterations in their history (Bevo and Southwest Garden) and a corner unit in a very historic neighborhood (Tower Grove East).

St. Louis desperately needs citywide preservation review. Every time I return to St. Louis, it's emptier in multiple senses of the word. Blairmont has caused a quick degradation of a longtime suffering bunch of neighborhoods; they appear to have ramped up their destructive efforts as of late.

Why can't we citizens have a say?

What We've Lost of Laclede's Landing.

What is technically St. Louis's oldest district is a fraction of its former self. The old Creole grid streets laid out in the 18th century survive today, but so much of Laclede's Landing has been lost that it is almost the caricature of a historic district. Compounding its piecemeal look is the new Lumiere Casino, which itself has bulldozed over a profoundly important St. Louis district and radically redefined its character.

Below is a view of Laclede's Landing in 1976, when Landmarks Association conducted an architectural survey for the nomination of Laclede's Landing to the National Register of Historic Places. At that time, plans were underway to transorm the sleepy manufacturing district that the wrecking ball forgot into a rowdy nightlife district.

I realize that the mentality that led to the clearance of the riverfront blocks for the Gateway Arch did not even include "preservation" in its consciousness. 1940 was simply too early; the nation had not yet begun its recognition of historic structures (except in Charleston and New Orleans, and a select few other places that got a head start). But when Eads Bridge intervened to save Laclede's Landing, and when plans in the 1970s called for redevelopment and not Urban Renewal, wouldn't you have assumed it would be forever "safe" as an intact district?

Think again:

From Laclede's Landing


All structures with red squares have been demolished/lost since 1976.

On the aerial photo, you may notice that, immediately south of the Martin Luther King Bridge, there is no parallel street that would be today's Laclede's Landing Boulevard. To ease traffic congestion, I suppose, someone thought it wise to exacerbate the bridge's ill effects on the area by creating another through-street and destroying several buildings in the process.



From Laclede's Landing

This is the 700 Block (east side) of North First in 1972. The buildings in the foreground are called the Brenco Corporation Buildings, while the slightly shorter Federal style structure was called the Missouri Box and Label Company.



Here is that site today:

From Laclede's Landing


Not even a parking lot. Surprising. What's that next door (just south)?



The sorely missed Switzer Building (1874), succumbed to a powerful storm in July of 2006 (as well as some good old-fashioned neglect). This Landmarks' 1972 vintage shot shows the building to be in decent condition.



From Laclede's Landing


Other felled buildings:

From Laclede's Landing

This is a 1971 view of Third and Lucas Streets. By the time of the 1976 survey, the smaller corner building had already been demolished. In 2009, none of these buildings remain. Saddest of all is the loss of the whimsical name "The Central Egg Company Building" (which belonged to the three-story structure in the foreground). The six-story building went by "Kroger". Tragically, a parking lot has been created in this spot today. To make matters worse, Lucas was closed off between Second and Third and is now a driveway for the parking lot. In other words, there is now a Parking Superblock that will likely remain for quite a while.



From Laclede's Landing

The Bronson Hide Company Building's death was covered by Vanishing STL, whom I thank for the above photograph. It once had a neighbor to its north that was demolished to make Laclede's Landing Blvd.



From Laclede's Landing


And these are just from Laclede's Landing proper. The city calls the area north of the MLK Bridge the Riverside North District in the St. Louis Downtown Development Action Plan (from the late 1990s?).



We have not yet discussed the Lumiere Place Casino demolitions in the so-called Riverside North District. Basically, Lumiere wiped out all of First Street north of the bridge for surface parking.



On Microsoft's Live Maps, some of the aerial photography appears to be from 2006, when Lumiere was under construction, while other angles have been since updated. Therefore, you can see an intact North First Street from one angle (looking south down N. First):



From Laclede's Landing


...then you can watch all of the buildings evaporate and magicly transform into a preened parking lot when you view it looking east toward the Mississippi River:



From Laclede's Landing


But many of these low-rise light manufacturing structures seemed insignificant, I guess, compared to the cast iron storefront warehouses that have been razed for the past couple decades (excepting, of course, the much-missed legendary live music venue, Mississippi Nights). Still, how do you explain the McPheeters Warehouses on L.K. Sullivan? Well, of course, Lumiere wanted the structures to come down, and so they did. There was no historic district; no forethought to the idea that the North Riverfront and the iconic Ashley Street Powerhouse might someday be the next rehabber hot spots. There was no discussion of the importance of reopening the riverfront to St. Louisans, no discussion on connecting the Central Business District to points north. There was certainly no public consultation of any kind. The buildings just came down, and with it them the chances that this "Riverside North District" would generate that interest level and maintain a physical connection to Laclede's Landing to the south.



From Laclede's Landing

Photo credit: Built St. Louis

The original plan to redevelop Laclede's Landing into a nightlife district should be commended for its attempt to put this neglected part of town back to use in such a way that might have preserved the structures within it. For a variety of reasons, Laclede's Landing seemed only to generate enough automobile traffic to create the parking pressure necessary, in city leaders' minds, to justify tearing down uber-historic buildings for surface parking lots. With Lumiere, it has only become worse. Not only have they increased parking pressure; they have increased parking supply. Vital historic districts do not contain vast tracts of surface parking.



It is more important than ever to consider emergency salvage of Laclede's Landing, which will continue to slip away if it is not able to redefine itself. The original problem was the isolation of the district. It has perhaps the hardest boundaries of any neighborhood I've ever seen: the Eads Bridge and Jefferson National Expansion Memorial parking garage to the south; the Mississippi River to the east; the elevated portion of I-70 to the west; and a semi-private street grid to the industrial north.



One of these things seems more corrigible than the others: Interstate 70. With the new Mississippi River Bridge being planned near Cass Avenue, I-70 will no longer begin north of I-55 in Missouri but will originate in Illinois and cross into Missouri from the new connection. It's been said that the remaining portion of the depressed section and the elevated section will be renamed I-44, which will be officially extended north until its meeting point with the new bridge. Echoing the Vanishing STL editorial on the same topic, the entire structure should be torn down instead, assisting the National Park Service in their attempts to connect the Arch Ground to downtown as well as serving the purpose of restitching Laclede's Landing back into the grid. This would allow better pedestrian connections and would diminish some of the parking pressures that have caused so much destruction in the entrapped district.

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

St. Louis CAN-DO

In furtherance to my earlier post, the St. Louis Civic Action Network and Discussion Online (CAN-DO) is up and running. We have a quite a few members already, but not a ton of activity.

Please join. Please add community events.

For too long we've been considered a parochial backwater. Let's show our civic spirit and keep one another aware of all of the local happenings that make our city great, lively, fun, unexpected, and, most of all, connected.

St. Louis CAN-DO.

Monday, April 13, 2009

Update: 2521 Farrar in Hyde Park on Preservation Board Agenda (Not 2125)

This post is a correction to an earlier one stating that there is a demolition being reviewed at 2125 Farrar in Hyde Park. The correct address is 2521 Farrar.

Here is a Live Maps capture:

From Hyde Park


It's a Second Empire micromansion by the looks of it. Anyone know of its current condition?

UPDATE: Ecology of Absence has posted on the circumstances between 2521 Farrar's demolition. Read more here.

Saturday, April 11, 2009

Found: McKinley Heights Flounder


View Larger Map

Located on the 2200 block of Charless in McKinley Heights.



Sadly, there used to be two side-by-side flounders on this block, a rare housing type found, for the most part, only in St. Louis and a handful of other cities. As you can see, it is characterized by a simple facade and a steep side roof pitch that translates to half of a second story. This is from the McKinley Fox National Register District nomination, circa 1984:



From McKinley Heights



There was another flounder on the 2200 block of Gaine, one block north of the Charless examples. It is now a vacant lot. It is pictured below (again from the McKinley Fox National Register nomination, again Circa 1984):




From McKinley Heights


For more information on St. Louis flounders, see Michael Allen's Ecology of Absence.

Thursday, April 9, 2009

April Preservation Board Also Contains Two National Register Nominations

In furtherance to the previous post, this month's Preservation Board Agenda features two important possible additions to the National Register of Historic Places.

The first is one of the remnants of old St. Louis, with its narrow commercial lots--the William A. Stickney Cigar Company Building at 209 N. 4th Street. Click here to see a Google Street View of the building.

The second is very exciting: the hulking National Candy Company industrial building at 4230 Gravois, which is technically in Dutchtown but, since I grew up in Bevo, I always claimed it as my neighborhood's heritage.

Imagine Schools is the applicant. Through a website search, it appears they're planning on opening an "Imagine International Academy of Arts" in this spot. They're likely going to use the Missouri state historic tax credits to renovate this large building into a workable condition. What a great building and wonderful re-use of the site!



View Larger Map

Early April Preservation Board Agenda Contains Two Proposed Demos

Click here for a link to the agenda, which does not yet contain the Cultural Resources individual staff reports.

On the chopping block this month is a two-family structure in Shaw on the 4100 block of DeTonty. Based on the description provided, this could be the corner structure (4100 DeTonty) or the next actual structure located all the way down at 4158 DeTonty. Both are attractive, historic buildings. The block, though, is almost entirely vacant lots. The proposed 11 new single family homes and 4 town house units would be great for Shaw. Millennium Restoration still owns these lots.

Millennium applied for demolition of two structures in the middle of this now mostly empty block back in 2006. Click here for that CRO report.

This is under the "Background" section of that 2006 report:

The original applicant for this site was McBride and Son, who proposed to construct 15 single family houses using designs created for the Botanical Heights subdivision in the McRee neighborhood, a few blocks north. At its meeting of September 26, 2005, the Preservation Board found that both 4118 and 4126 DeTonty Avenue are structurally
unsound and rehabilitation is not feasible. The Board also required that revisions be made to the design of the proposed buildings to make them compatible with the historic buildings in the neighborhood. Subsequently, McBride chose not to make the required revisions and withdrew from the project.

The current applicant, Millennium Restoration and Development, proposes 17 new
houses in place of 15, with detached garages at the alley.


Apparently, plans have changed a bit. The proposed 17 units has gone down to 15 once more.



Here are the buildings that were ultimately demolished (pictures are captures from the Cultural Resources Office reports):



From Preservation Board


From Preservation Board


And here are the two buildings that were spared before, one of which, likely 4100, that may get demolished after all:



From Preservation Board


The renderings for the original project are also contained on that 2006 agenda:

From Preservation Board


Is Millennium still on this project? Do these renderings still stand? What will the town house units look like? Once we answer these questions, we can begin to critique this demolition.



While I am not so much a fan of purely historicist new construction, Millennium certainly have shown themselves capable creators of a historic aesthetic in new construction.



Again, I'll have to reserve judgment for when I see the (potentially new) designs for this site. In the meantime, here are Millennium's older renderings that are available on their web site.



The second proposed demolition is an LRA property at 2125 Farrar in Hyde Park.

The city doesn't seem to think this address exists on its city data website. The application for demolition is for a "2-story, single family brick structure." Since odd-numbered addresses are on the north side of the street, and since the north side of the 2100 block of Farrar is a large industrial complex, I don't know where this property is. It could, of course, be a typo.



More information will be posted as it becomes available.

Fashion STL Style!

Fashion STL Style!
St. Louis Gives You the Shirt Off of Its Own Back!

Next American City

Next American City
Your Go-To Source for Urban Affairs

Join the StreetsBlog Network!

Join the StreetsBlog Network!
Your Source for Livable Streets

Trust in Rust!

Trust in Rust!
News from the Rustbelt

Dotage St. Louis -- Blogging the St. Louis Built Environment Since 2008

Topics: Historic Preservation, Politics and Government, Development, Architecture, Urban Planning, Urban Design, Local Business, Crime and Safety, Neighborhoods, and Anything Else Relating to Making St. Louis a Better City!