Search This Blog (A.K.A. "I Dote On...")
(Updated: Now with comments and minute marks)
These videos, obtained from Archive.org, are a wonderful look into the mindset of circa 1956 modern planners and "city builders". They're also painful to watch. Dozens of cities' historic building stocks crumble, tumble, and fall before your eyes. Why? Because their lots are small and they're not new. Simple as that.
While a lot of what the narrator observes is "true", little attention is paid to the force of American public policy in shaping these realities. What is most striking, though, is the sheer confidence that starting over and building anew was naturally superior. There is almost a point in this video where you hear the crisis of modernism in the context of the city: the narrator must defend density as a part of urban life while simultaneously arguing that the previous way of urban life was deficient, outmoded, obsolete. Yet cities were more dense with their scores of small- and mid-scale architecture than they became, in so many American downtowns, when office towers and parking lots replaced whole blocks.
These must be watched to be believed.
PART I:
Dotage St. Louis -- Blogging the St. Louis Built Environment Since 2008
Topics: Historic Preservation, Politics and Government, Development, Architecture, Urban Planning, Urban Design, Local Business, Crime and Safety, Neighborhoods, and Anything Else Relating to Making St. Louis a Better City!
1 comments:
Ironic and sad how it took only one generation to screw up our cities, yet it will take many to undo the damage that was done.
I love how the film completely contradicts itself by saying that the narrow lot developments are obsolete, yet they praise the construction of a new coop hi-rise on a 30' x 60' site and similarly praise the construction of the Ford Apartments here in STL, again a tall building on a fairly narrow lot with no setback.
Post a Comment